The article only focuses on the counterclaim which was filed in reaction to Fluence's original claim against Diablo Energy Storage, LLC ("Diablo"), even mentioning the law firm which filed it. Fluence's original claim was for Diablo's failure to comply with the terms of their contract, including payment of the remaining balance owed to Fluence and for other related damages. Instead of discussing Fluence's position, set forth in its complaint, the article focused on the counterclaim.

Fluence is pleased with the work it accomplished on the Diablo Plant, which is the subject of the complaint, and it wants and expects to be paid for its work. Fluence believes the counterclaim is without merit, and Fluence will vigorously pursue its affirmative claims as well as defend against the claims by the defendant Diablo Energy Storage, LLC.